What’s Taking Root?

What we’re reading, watching, and questioning across the field

Supported By :
In Partnership With:

Welcome to What’s Taking Root, a new series I’m curating for Proximate Press that highlights emerging ideas and resources to deepen grassroots grantmaking. I’m a philanthropy practitioner and ecosystem weaver who has mapped 100+ resources to reimagine philanthropy and global development. 

In this first edition, we get into assumptions and hard truths about board governance, community-led philanthropic infrastructure, and funder solidarity with movements. 

Root: Shaking up board governance is long overdue 

Boardrooms remain one of the most exclusive spaces in philanthropy. New models of community- and movement-led governance demonstrate how power can be shared at the highest levels of philanthropic decision-making.

Several new resources emphasize that most board structures are based on assumptions and traditions rather than on actual legal requirements, and that community voice on boards is central to their philanthropic fiduciary responsibility. They highlight multiple funders shifting toward community governance, including the Kolibri Foundation and the Elimna B. Sewall Foundation

Resources:

Action:

Take the first step by looking inward and questioning assumptions about expertise, professionalism, and risk. Attend an upcoming virtual deep dive conversation ‘Listen to Community: Shifting Power in the Boardroom’ on July 23rd

Root: The infrastructure for community-led philanthropy already exists 

Whether examining Global Majority philanthropic traditions, locally led pooled funds, or what’s missing in speculations about an AI-fueled third wave of philanthropy, these resources underscore that the infrastructure for community-led development at scale already exists.

What is often perceived as a capacity gap is more accurately a recognition, trust, and funding gap. As long as philanthropy continues to assume that the Western (or Silicon Valley) model is the gold standard, funders will continue to overlook and ultimately constrain the leadership and systems that communities have already built.

Resources:

Resources:

Action:

Follow organizations such as NEAR, TrustAfrica, International Indigenous Women’s Forum, Pawanka Fund, and the Global Fund for Community Foundations to learn from philanthropic traditions outside the U.S. and Europe. 

Root: Supporting movements means showing up for the long haul as an ecosystem 

Philanthropy has yet to realize its staying power for social change, and often undermines the very change it seeks to advance. It invests in democracy in short election-cycle bursts. It funds movement protection as a short-term emergency. It hesitates to fully resource movements through liberatory practices. It shies away from investing in financial capital and asset-building for sustained resilience.

These resources illuminate each of these shortcomings and collectively argue that solidarity requires more than grants: it demands long-term, high-commitment investments over decades in the broader ecosystems and infrastructure that protect and sustain the leaders and movements most impacted by oppression. 

Solidarity also means examining how internal practices may inadvertently harm movements and engaging in funder-to-funder organizing. 

Resources:

Action:

Look beyond your grants and ask how your institution can act more courageously in solidarity with communities and movements. 

Also worth digging into. . . 

Thanks for reading! You can follow along with future editions of Grassroots Grantmaking here.

More Reads

No items found.

Proximate is an independent media platform covering movements for participatory problem-solving. We look at the news through the lens of money: how it’s given away, how it’s invested, and how it’s distributed by government.
We are a fiscally sponsored project of Movement Strategy Center.

Get Our Monthly Issues

Proximate
© 2025 PROXIMATE ® ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.